Effectively communicating authentic brand activism and garnering consumer support remains ongoing challenges for brands. This study examines how they can develop and communicate authentic brand activism on social media, and how consumers respond to such communication over time. Using a Computational Grounded Theory (CGT) approach, we analyzed 489 activist posts and 17,634 user comments on Instagram from a reputable activist brand. Findings reveal the Brand Activism Path (BAP), driven by “activism intensity”, which is expressed through messaging frequency and tone of voice. The results also show that adverse reactions stem from ideological misalignment and perceived brand over-politicization, highlighting that backlash extends beyond perceptions of inauthenticity. Finally, we propose the Activism Intensity-Response Matrix (AIRM), which categorizes distinct forms of brand activism based on the intensity of activism and consumer responses. These insights can guide managers in developing effective activist communication and sustaining audience support, while outlining empirically testable pathways grounded in the research propositions.
The brand activism path: Mapping the activism intensity and consumer responses
Antonella Cammarota;Mario D'Arco
;Vittoria Marino;Riccardo Resciniti
2026-01-01
Abstract
Effectively communicating authentic brand activism and garnering consumer support remains ongoing challenges for brands. This study examines how they can develop and communicate authentic brand activism on social media, and how consumers respond to such communication over time. Using a Computational Grounded Theory (CGT) approach, we analyzed 489 activist posts and 17,634 user comments on Instagram from a reputable activist brand. Findings reveal the Brand Activism Path (BAP), driven by “activism intensity”, which is expressed through messaging frequency and tone of voice. The results also show that adverse reactions stem from ideological misalignment and perceived brand over-politicization, highlighting that backlash extends beyond perceptions of inauthenticity. Finally, we propose the Activism Intensity-Response Matrix (AIRM), which categorizes distinct forms of brand activism based on the intensity of activism and consumer responses. These insights can guide managers in developing effective activist communication and sustaining audience support, while outlining empirically testable pathways grounded in the research propositions.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


