This paper presents a metrology-oriented review of vision-based displacement and deformation measurement for civil structural health monitoring (SHM), with an emphasis on field robustness and uncertainty quantification (UQ). The review focuses on image- and video-based methods that convert visual information into quantitative physical measurements, such as displacement, strain, or derived dynamic indicators. The literature is organized according to the main stages of the measurement chain: image formation, image-plane motion estimation, and geometric conversion to metric motion. Within this framework, measurement pipelines are interpreted through three levels of geometric mapping, namely, a scalar scale-factor model, a planar homography-based model, and a full Jacobian-based model. The review synthesizes major method families, including marker-based and markerless tracking, feature-based tracking, optical flow, digital image correlation (DIC), phase-based motion magnification, edge-based estimators, fixed- and moving-camera configurations, UAV-based acquisition with ego-motion compensation, hybrid vision–sensor fusion, and deep-learning-enhanced pipelines. A structured taxonomy of uncertainty sources is then presented along the processing chain, covering camera geometry and calibration, imaging noise and blur, quantization, timing and synchronization, environmental disturbances, optical turbulence and heat haze, platform motion, algorithmic failure modes, and reference-sensor uncertainty. The paper also compares UQ practices, including GUM-aligned analytical propagation, Monte Carlo methods, DIC-specific error budgets, bootstrap and resampling strategies, and probabilistic deep learning. The main contribution of this review is to connect computer-vision-based displacement pipelines with metrological requirements by explicitly linking measurement models, uncertainty sources, UQ methods, and field-validation evidence within a unified framework. A practical uncertainty-budget template is compiled to support traceable reporting across different pipelines and deployment scenarios. The paper concludes with prioritized research gaps and future directions, including standardized benchmarks and datasets, traceable UQ for moving-camera systems, multi-sensor fusion with end-to-end uncertainty propagation, long-term drift characterization, optical-turbulence and adverse-weather modeling, validated subpixel limits at extreme range, probabilistic deep learning–metrology integration, and standardized reporting practices.

Vision-Based Displacement Measurement for Structural Health Monitoring: A Metrology-Oriented Review of Uncertainty Quantification

Neyestani A.;Picariello F.;Tudosa I.;Monaco M.;De Vito L.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents a metrology-oriented review of vision-based displacement and deformation measurement for civil structural health monitoring (SHM), with an emphasis on field robustness and uncertainty quantification (UQ). The review focuses on image- and video-based methods that convert visual information into quantitative physical measurements, such as displacement, strain, or derived dynamic indicators. The literature is organized according to the main stages of the measurement chain: image formation, image-plane motion estimation, and geometric conversion to metric motion. Within this framework, measurement pipelines are interpreted through three levels of geometric mapping, namely, a scalar scale-factor model, a planar homography-based model, and a full Jacobian-based model. The review synthesizes major method families, including marker-based and markerless tracking, feature-based tracking, optical flow, digital image correlation (DIC), phase-based motion magnification, edge-based estimators, fixed- and moving-camera configurations, UAV-based acquisition with ego-motion compensation, hybrid vision–sensor fusion, and deep-learning-enhanced pipelines. A structured taxonomy of uncertainty sources is then presented along the processing chain, covering camera geometry and calibration, imaging noise and blur, quantization, timing and synchronization, environmental disturbances, optical turbulence and heat haze, platform motion, algorithmic failure modes, and reference-sensor uncertainty. The paper also compares UQ practices, including GUM-aligned analytical propagation, Monte Carlo methods, DIC-specific error budgets, bootstrap and resampling strategies, and probabilistic deep learning. The main contribution of this review is to connect computer-vision-based displacement pipelines with metrological requirements by explicitly linking measurement models, uncertainty sources, UQ methods, and field-validation evidence within a unified framework. A practical uncertainty-budget template is compiled to support traceable reporting across different pipelines and deployment scenarios. The paper concludes with prioritized research gaps and future directions, including standardized benchmarks and datasets, traceable UQ for moving-camera systems, multi-sensor fusion with end-to-end uncertainty propagation, long-term drift characterization, optical-turbulence and adverse-weather modeling, validated subpixel limits at extreme range, probabilistic deep learning–metrology integration, and standardized reporting practices.
2026
measurement uncertainty
structural health monitoring (SHM)
uncertainty quantification
vision-based displacement measurement
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12070/76305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact