A systematic method to quantify, rank and map the distribution of hazards is applied tothe coastal cliffs of the Sorrento Peninsula and Capri (Campania, southern Italy). For such cliffs,which have previously been characterized in terms of types and processes, and therefore compartmentalized,the predisposition to a particular hazard (or indicator), based on its nature, magnitudeand recurrence, is evaluated by assigning a code: the higher the predisposition, the higher the codefor each compartment. Moreover, hazards can influence one another, and the number of such interactionsindicates the seriousness of each hazard, to which a weighting is assigned. By comparingeach code in a specific compartment using an interaction matrix, which takes the weighting intoconsideration, we have calculated a resultant, which is the overall hazard for the compartment.This resultant can also be expressed cartographically. In this application six primary hazards(parameters) are considered: cliff retreat, riverine flooding, storms, landslides, seismicity and volcanism,and man-made structures. The last is the most hazardous parameter, which is weightedhighly, owing to its extensive influence on the other hazards. In contrast, riverine flooding andseismicity and volcanism are the least interactive.
Application of a method to assess coastal hazard: the cliffs of the Sorrento Peninsula and Capri (southern Italy)
VALENTE A.
2009-01-01
Abstract
A systematic method to quantify, rank and map the distribution of hazards is applied tothe coastal cliffs of the Sorrento Peninsula and Capri (Campania, southern Italy). For such cliffs,which have previously been characterized in terms of types and processes, and therefore compartmentalized,the predisposition to a particular hazard (or indicator), based on its nature, magnitudeand recurrence, is evaluated by assigning a code: the higher the predisposition, the higher the codefor each compartment. Moreover, hazards can influence one another, and the number of such interactionsindicates the seriousness of each hazard, to which a weighting is assigned. By comparingeach code in a specific compartment using an interaction matrix, which takes the weighting intoconsideration, we have calculated a resultant, which is the overall hazard for the compartment.This resultant can also be expressed cartographically. In this application six primary hazards(parameters) are considered: cliff retreat, riverine flooding, storms, landslides, seismicity and volcanism,and man-made structures. The last is the most hazardous parameter, which is weightedhighly, owing to its extensive influence on the other hazards. In contrast, riverine flooding andseismicity and volcanism are the least interactive.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SP322_Geohazards_Valente.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
826.65 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
826.65 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.