Strategic buildings, such as schools, play a crucial role in civil society. They are essential not only for the well-being of communities but also for their significance during the emergency and recovery phases following an earthquake. Reliable risk assessment is a powerful tool for implementing effective mitigation strategies. While considerable work has been already done in the literature to develop fragility curves and risk studies for residential buildings, there remains a noticeable gap in addressing risk assessment for school portfolios. As part of the 2019–2021 MARS (Seismic Risk MAps) project, funded by the Italian Civil Protection Department and involving the ReLUIS consortium along with the EUCENTRE foundation, a specific task was dedicated to evaluating seismic risk for the Italian school buildings. In this context, eight research units combined their expertise to develop a consensus-based vulnerability model, known as the “School-MARS model”. This model integrates fragility curves based on various approaches (i.e. empirical, mechanical-analytical, mechanical-numerical and hybrid) and is tailored to archetypes representative of the Italian school buildings. The main goal of the paper is outlining the methodology used to define the “School-MARS vulnerability model”. Moreover, the paper demonstrates the application of the latter for performing intensity-based and time-based risk analyses. Specifically, the results are presented in terms of damage distribution and usability ratings expected for the entire stock of Italian school building. Notably, these results indicate that approximately 26 % of Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings and 31 % of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) structures may become unusable due to potential earthquakes expected in the next 50 years.

National risk assessment of Italian school buildings: The MARS project experience

Del Vecchio, Ciro
Formal Analysis
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Strategic buildings, such as schools, play a crucial role in civil society. They are essential not only for the well-being of communities but also for their significance during the emergency and recovery phases following an earthquake. Reliable risk assessment is a powerful tool for implementing effective mitigation strategies. While considerable work has been already done in the literature to develop fragility curves and risk studies for residential buildings, there remains a noticeable gap in addressing risk assessment for school portfolios. As part of the 2019–2021 MARS (Seismic Risk MAps) project, funded by the Italian Civil Protection Department and involving the ReLUIS consortium along with the EUCENTRE foundation, a specific task was dedicated to evaluating seismic risk for the Italian school buildings. In this context, eight research units combined their expertise to develop a consensus-based vulnerability model, known as the “School-MARS model”. This model integrates fragility curves based on various approaches (i.e. empirical, mechanical-analytical, mechanical-numerical and hybrid) and is tailored to archetypes representative of the Italian school buildings. The main goal of the paper is outlining the methodology used to define the “School-MARS vulnerability model”. Moreover, the paper demonstrates the application of the latter for performing intensity-based and time-based risk analyses. Specifically, the results are presented in terms of damage distribution and usability ratings expected for the entire stock of Italian school building. Notably, these results indicate that approximately 26 % of Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings and 31 % of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) structures may become unusable due to potential earthquakes expected in the next 50 years.
2024
Archetypes; Fragility curve; Masonry; Reinforced concrete; School buildings; Seismic maps
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12070/67242
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact