As commonly known, to evaluate the claims reserve (otherwise known as the provision for outstandingclaims), the loss adjuster uses as a first component the claims reserve given by the sum of the estimatedprovision for each outstanding claim (known as case reserve). Traditional statistical-actuarial methodsare used to control and/or asseverate the evaluation and recent developments have tended to ensurethat these enable an independent assessment of the claims reserve. In some European countries, a largesubset of motor liability claims is managed within a direct reimbursement (DR) scheme. In Italy, theintroduction of the direct compensation CARD system for third-party liability insurance has resulted ingreater attention in the use of these traditional methods due to the heterogeneity of the data availablefor evaluations. This paper presents the results of a study undertaken to define a calculation method that,using the different assumptions that describe the evolution of settlement mechanisms, is able to quantifythe claims reserve. The proposed methodology reduces the loss adjuster’s discretion in applying statisticalmethods since all assumptions must be made explicit and can hence be monitored and controlled.Furthermore, a stress test can be performed on all the parameters that influence the settlement andthus the claims reserve. Finally, in a backtesting perspective, the proposed methodology enables anex-post analysis of actual cash flow deviations compared to expected values, identifying the variablesthat lead to these differences. In particular, a calculation method is presented that using the differentassumptions describing the evolution of the settlement of different claim handling procedures (Non-Card,Card, Handler Forfait and Debtor Forfait) is able to quantify the claims reserve. Via simulations, futurepayments, the expected value of the claims reserve and some indicators of variability are also estimated.The numerical application allows comparing the results obtained with those deriving from the applicationof traditional statistical methods.The problem of aggregating the four claim handling procedures is dealt with by using copulas withthe goal of building a single distribution of the aggregate claims reserve. Furthermore, in a Solvency IIperspective, the capital requirement is determined against the reserve risk based on the internal modelproposed and is compared with the standard formula proposed by EIOPA.
Stochastic model to evaluate the fair value of motor third-party liability under the direct reimbursement scheme and quantification of the capital requirement in a Solvency II perspective
FERSINI, PAOLA;MELISI, GIUSEPPE
2016-01-01
Abstract
As commonly known, to evaluate the claims reserve (otherwise known as the provision for outstandingclaims), the loss adjuster uses as a first component the claims reserve given by the sum of the estimatedprovision for each outstanding claim (known as case reserve). Traditional statistical-actuarial methodsare used to control and/or asseverate the evaluation and recent developments have tended to ensurethat these enable an independent assessment of the claims reserve. In some European countries, a largesubset of motor liability claims is managed within a direct reimbursement (DR) scheme. In Italy, theintroduction of the direct compensation CARD system for third-party liability insurance has resulted ingreater attention in the use of these traditional methods due to the heterogeneity of the data availablefor evaluations. This paper presents the results of a study undertaken to define a calculation method that,using the different assumptions that describe the evolution of settlement mechanisms, is able to quantifythe claims reserve. The proposed methodology reduces the loss adjuster’s discretion in applying statisticalmethods since all assumptions must be made explicit and can hence be monitored and controlled.Furthermore, a stress test can be performed on all the parameters that influence the settlement andthus the claims reserve. Finally, in a backtesting perspective, the proposed methodology enables anex-post analysis of actual cash flow deviations compared to expected values, identifying the variablesthat lead to these differences. In particular, a calculation method is presented that using the differentassumptions describing the evolution of the settlement of different claim handling procedures (Non-Card,Card, Handler Forfait and Debtor Forfait) is able to quantify the claims reserve. Via simulations, futurepayments, the expected value of the claims reserve and some indicators of variability are also estimated.The numerical application allows comparing the results obtained with those deriving from the applicationof traditional statistical methods.The problem of aggregating the four claim handling procedures is dealt with by using copulas withthe goal of building a single distribution of the aggregate claims reserve. Furthermore, in a Solvency IIperspective, the capital requirement is determined against the reserve risk based on the internal modelproposed and is compared with the standard formula proposed by EIOPA.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.