This paper discusses three controversial questions to which I was naturally led by the reading of John E. King’s A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936 (2002). First, did King unduly play down the role of the second generation of Post Keynesian economists? Second, how revolutionary were Keynes’s writings, and how radical should Post Keynesian economics be? Finally, what is the future of Post Keynesian economics?
A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936: Some Hard Questions (and not so Hard) Questions for the Future
FONTANA G
2005-01-01
Abstract
This paper discusses three controversial questions to which I was naturally led by the reading of John E. King’s A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936 (2002). First, did King unduly play down the role of the second generation of Post Keynesian economists? Second, how revolutionary were Keynes’s writings, and how radical should Post Keynesian economics be? Finally, what is the future of Post Keynesian economics?File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
JPKE_27(3)_2005.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
111.21 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
111.21 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
